"Well, I don't know, National Treasure could have a place in postmodernist history!"
-Mitchell, 3rd period, February 5th 2016
National Treasure is not your typical historical drama. In fact, it escapes most categories of film besides "Nicolas Cage" film: action movie chosen seemingly at random starring one of Hollywood's most unusual A-list actors. The film is famous for it's stretches of the imagination, featuring several tangentially-related out-of-context historical figures and events pieced together into one streamlined conspiratorially-based hamfest. There's plenty of fleeting fun to be had, but beyond many pieces of historical trivia, there is no modernist idea of history to be found. But strap up your Mitchell goggles, because
National Treasure is actually an in-depth study in postmodernist history!
Let's think about what postmodernism is for a second. What we've discussed in class is an "attack" on modernist principle, a diverging from previous set conventions that is aggressive and self-aware. In the context of historical fiction (which National Treasure sort of pretty much is) we've explored the many different uses of historical fact in our postmodern literature, which usually boils down to recycling these realities and preconceptions and putting them to a different narrative. The movie in question passes with flying colors in these regards. Ben Gates (played by Cage), the titular treasure-hunter of the film, goes on a quest to find the "national treasure" a secret entrusted to his family by the oldest signer of the Declaration of Independence, Charles Carroll. The only clue given is "the secret lies with Charlotte". Gates, also a cryptologist, traces the clue back to the Arctic ship the Charlotte which leads to a heist and following lemon-juicing of the Declaration of Independence, which eventually takes his ragtag mystery gang to the Liberty Bell and some other crap Ben Franklin did. And then they find it! Where was I? Oh yeah, postmodern cinema. This entire movie takes the ideas of historical context and research, crunches it up, and kicks it out the nearest window. All historical points of interest are trivialized and fitted into a new, complex narrative, that suits to entertain viewers and leave all the other malarkey by the wayside. But I guess we can't really PROVE that the Declaration of Independence has some invisible ink on the back, right? It sounds stupid at first, but National Treasure takes a self-aware stand against the boring, plodding versions of American history through it's massive unbelievability. Hey, speaking of conspiracy theories, postmodern American history, and new narratives, remember Mumbo Jumbo?
The reason that Mumbo Jumbo and National Treasure are actually long lost cousins is their insistence on postmodernly recycling certain historical events to fit a broader, differing, brand new story. Warren G Harding might be simply known as one of the worst presidents we've ever had, but what if he was actually the work of a secret Wallflower Order, the anti to the anti-plague of Jes Grew in the early 20th century? "Of course not!", a filthy modernist exclaims. But the hip postmodernist nonchalantly adds: "Yeah, why not dude? And while we're at it, has anyone lemon-juiced the Declaration of Independence, to like, check for a special message?"